direct recording question

Amplifiers, effects, pickups, electronic components, wiring, etc.

Moderator: Dave Mudgett

User avatar
Delvin Morgan
Posts: 614
Joined: 19 Sep 2004 12:01 am
Location: Lindstrom, Minnesota, USA
State/Province: Minnesota
Country: United States

direct recording question

Post by Delvin Morgan »

I have been looking at the Podxt, but then I have a SoundBlaster Audigy2zs card and ProfexII, so why do I need to learn something else. The SB let's me plug the guitar/profex directly into the card for recording.
If I am wrong please set me straight.

Del

------------------
Emmons S-10,Nashville-112,Peavey Pro-Fex II
User avatar
Rick Johnson
Posts: 1572
Joined: 19 Jan 2001 1:01 am
Location: Wheelwright, Ky USA
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Rick Johnson »

You can record that way but do you
have the luxuries that the PODxt
offers? I've had a PODxt for about
six weeks and its incredible.
It may be designed for the guitar
but I've been able to get some good
settings tweaked for steel.

------------------
Rick Johnson
User avatar
Tim Harr
Posts: 2569
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Dunlap, Illinois
State/Province: Illinois
Country: United States

Post by Tim Harr »

Check out some of my :60 second samples at the below site. I use the PODxt direct via USB cable to my Dell Home computer
http://groups.msn.com/TimHarrWebPage/mp3samples.msnw

------------------
Tim Harr
Carter D-10 8/9 w/ BL-705s, Hilton pedal, PODxt, Webb 6-14E Amplifier, 65 Twin Reverb
http://groups.msn.com/TimHarrWebPage


<font size="1" color="#8e236b"><p align="center">[This message was edited by Tim Harr on 28 April 2005 at 08:02 AM.]</p></FONT>
User avatar
Jack Stoner
Posts: 22147
Joined: 3 Dec 1999 1:01 am
Location: Kansas City, MO
State/Province: Kansas
Country: United States

Post by Jack Stoner »

The big difference is the POD XT is an amp and speaker modeler (emulates other amps and speakers) where the Profex II does not, it's just a digital preamp and effects processor. The Profex II tends to be a bit noisy for direct recording where the POD XT is designed for direct recording.

Although your sound card will take the "line level" output of the Profex II you wouldn't be able to use the guitar direct to the sound card as the guitar (and standard P.A. microphones) have a very low level and not sufficient for the computer sound card.
User avatar
Delvin Morgan
Posts: 614
Joined: 19 Sep 2004 12:01 am
Location: Lindstrom, Minnesota, USA
State/Province: Minnesota
Country: United States

Post by Delvin Morgan »

So do you run your mic through Podxt for vocals too?

------------------
Emmons S-10,Nashville-112,Peavey Pro-Fex II
User avatar
Delvin Morgan
Posts: 614
Joined: 19 Sep 2004 12:01 am
Location: Lindstrom, Minnesota, USA
State/Province: Minnesota
Country: United States

Post by Delvin Morgan »

Wow Tim,
Those clips are fantastic, guess I will have to break down and get a PODxt. Not that I will sound anything like you, but I try.

Del
Jonathan Cullifer
Posts: 1132
Joined: 30 Sep 1998 12:01 am
Location: Gallatin, TN
State/Province: Tennessee
Country: United States

Post by Jonathan Cullifer »

I'm glad they did something on the Podxt; my Pod 2.0 is somewhat noisy for recording. Most of the effects I need I just add in later in my recording software. On the other hand, your mileage may vary.