MP3 vs WMA--which is better?

The machines we love to hate

Moderator: Wiz Feinberg

User avatar
Michael Haselman
Posts: 1308
Joined: 23 Aug 2002 12:01 am
Location: St. Paul

MP3 vs WMA--which is better?

Post by Michael Haselman »

I use my MP3 player at work every day. I use a bitrate of 56k so I can fit more songs on it. Is Windows Media better that MP3 for this application?

------------------
Marrs D-10, Webb 6-14E
User avatar
Michael Haselman
Posts: 1308
Joined: 23 Aug 2002 12:01 am
Location: St. Paul

Post by Michael Haselman »

Anybody? Just wondering if I should go through the hassle of downloading Windows Media Player. Been using Musicmatch for a long time.
Doug Brumley
Posts: 64
Joined: 10 Aug 2003 12:01 am
Location: Nashville, Tennessee, USA

Post by Doug Brumley »

Michael, after skimming a few sites that address this topic, it seems that WMA is regarded as better for lower bitrates when compared to MP3. For some direct comparisons between the two, which allows you to judge based on your particular ears, just go to Google and enter "wma vs. mp3" in the search field. The ensuing sites should help you find your answer.<FONT SIZE=1 COLOR="#8e236b"><p align=CENTER>[This message was edited by Doug Brumley on 19 September 2003 at 06:36 PM.]</p></FONT>