Video Card
Moderator: Wiz Feinberg
-
Joe Delaronde
- Posts: 1037
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Selkirk, Manitoba, Canada
Video Card
Can anyone suggets a good video card for editing Video tapes??
Joe
Joe
-
Joe Delaronde
- Posts: 1037
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Selkirk, Manitoba, Canada
-
Bill Crook
- Posts: 1834
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Goodlettsville, TN , Spending my kid's inheritance
-
Donny Hinson
- Posts: 21753
- Joined: 16 Feb 1999 1:01 am
- Location: Glen Burnie, Md. U.S.A.
Bill, the ATI "All In Wonder" card got rather low ratings compared to the ATI "Turbo-Rage" in most of the tech-pubs. I have the 16-meg "Turbo Rage" and its performs rather nicely, DVD and all. (Doesn't require an accelerator card either, to run the latest games.) The "TR" rated faster in most all applications. I suspect they use a slower VRAM chip in the "AIW", to keep costs down.
Also, (and a lot of people don't know this) a 32-meg video card is NO faster than a 16-meg video card of the same make, and model. The 32-meg card merely allows higher resolutions (which my "Guru" says are useless in a home computer, unless you're doing CAD, or photo-retouching on a big monitor!). <FONT SIZE=1 COLOR="#8e236b"><p align=CENTER>[This message was edited by Donny Hinson on 05 April 2001 at 02:53 PM.]</p></FONT>
Also, (and a lot of people don't know this) a 32-meg video card is NO faster than a 16-meg video card of the same make, and model. The 32-meg card merely allows higher resolutions (which my "Guru" says are useless in a home computer, unless you're doing CAD, or photo-retouching on a big monitor!). <FONT SIZE=1 COLOR="#8e236b"><p align=CENTER>[This message was edited by Donny Hinson on 05 April 2001 at 02:53 PM.]</p></FONT>
-
Joe Delaronde
- Posts: 1037
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Selkirk, Manitoba, Canada