Lightening the load

Amplifiers, effects, pickups, electronic components, wiring, etc.

Moderator: Dave Mudgett

User avatar
Russ Little
Posts: 342
Joined: 29 Jun 2005 12:01 am
Location: Hosston,Louisiana, USA
State/Province: Louisiana
Country: United States

Lightening the load

Post by Russ Little »

My wife bought me a vintage peavey mace 212
in a garage sale last month.
Its a great tube amp 160 watts, but a pain
to tote around at 80lbs.
I just converted it to a single 15" speaker
Its great now on my steel. Hope it doesn't
devalue it, not that I plan to part with it
Whats your thoughts on it
Russ
Bobby Boggs
Posts: 6472
Joined: 2 Dec 1999 1:01 am
Location: Upstate SC.
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Bobby Boggs »

I didn't remember a Mace being that heavy.Is a Mace heavier than a Deuce with the 15 SRO? ...........bb
Jim Palenscar
Posts: 6031
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Oceanside, Calif, USA
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Jim Palenscar »

I just took a Mace head in on consignment- great amp- 6 6L6's! I also have a 2-12 Peavey speaker cabinet to go with it and it sounds great~~
User avatar
Russ Little
Posts: 342
Joined: 29 Jun 2005 12:01 am
Location: Hosston,Louisiana, USA
State/Province: Louisiana
Country: United States

Post by Russ Little »

This one looks vintage and had two 12s I weighed it and it weightd 80lbs.
I removed the 12s and put in a 15 and a lighter
support panel and droped it to 66lbs.
It looks like it came that way now.
Im loving it. Looks like the tubes are all
original
c c johnson
Posts: 1902
Joined: 29 Jan 1999 1:01 am
Location: killeen,tx usa * R.I.P.
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by c c johnson »

I didn't think any amp could be heavier than my old Duece of many yrs back. It was dependable as it could be though. You central Texas guys may remember Sefcik Hall. We played a sunday afternoon gig there and I dropped it down the flight of 14 steps I believe there were. We left to play another gig about 2hrs later and we had made plans for me to play through the PA. When we arrived I plugged in the duece and it purred like a kitten. My youngest son has played it in a rock band all these yrs and it is still purring. CC
Charles Davidson
Posts: 7549
Joined: 9 Jul 2005 12:01 am
Location: Phenix City Alabama, USA
State/Province: Alabama
Country: United States

Post by Charles Davidson »

Years ago I played a twin with JBL's then peavey 500,session-400,session-400 ltd NV-400,then something wonderful happened to LIGHTEN MY LOAD.ALONG CAME THE NV -112!!!! I never dreamed an amp with one 12 inch speaker Iwould handle a d-10 [I play 98% C6th]without breaking up and sounding like crap.All of the overkill monsters mentioned above sound GREAT NO DOUBT,but the difference in the weight,IMO is not worth it.
User avatar
David Doggett
Posts: 8088
Joined: 20 Aug 2002 12:01 am
Location: Bawl'mer, MD (formerly of MS, Nawluns, Gnashville, Knocksville, Lost Angeles, Bahsten. and Philly)
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by David Doggett »

It all comes down to whether you want tube tone or not. If not, the solid state equipment is getting lighter and lighter. You can use digital modeling to add some tube tone to solid state. It's not quite the same, but it is getting closer and closer. You can put a tube preamp in front of a solid state amp or powered speakers, but you end up with as many pieces of equipment, and almost the same weight as using a tube amp head and separate speaker. If you want true tube tone in the preamp and the power amp, and need the headroom a big watt amp provides, you may always be stuck with very heavy equipment. I deal with it by breaking it up into amp heads and separate speakers. Solid state amps sound okay (not great) up to moderate volumes, and small to medium tube amps can work in situations of moderate stage volume and miking through the PA. But for loud stage volume and unmiked raw amp sound, there is nothing like a big all tube amp. Is it worth the extra weight and maintenance hassles? It is for some, not for others. Many guitar players, bassists, organ players, drummers, etc. carry around huge heavy rigs. They consider it part of the job and wouldn't think of cutting corners simply to save weight. Others are beginning to change over to lighter equipment taking advantage of digital modeling and new lightweight materials. I think we are in a time of transition where everyone has to find his own way.

------------------
<font size="1">Student of the Steel: Zum uni, Fender tube amps, squareneck and roundneck resos, tenor sax, keyboards

User avatar
Russ Little
Posts: 342
Joined: 29 Jun 2005 12:01 am
Location: Hosston,Louisiana, USA
State/Province: Louisiana
Country: United States

Post by Russ Little »

Charles,
your right about the nv112.
I use it when I have to travel
and leave the big boy at church.
Sure cuts down on the setup time.
and lots easier on the back
Charles Davidson
Posts: 7549
Joined: 9 Jul 2005 12:01 am
Location: Phenix City Alabama, USA
State/Province: Alabama
Country: United States

Post by Charles Davidson »

I fully understand the guys that love their BIG amps,and yes they sound great.In the past year I have played gigs in 6 states,indoor and outdoor,except for maybe two or three jobs every thing was miked.This past weekend play a large amphitheater with my 112,had a good sound man and monitor mix,my 112 sounded as GOOD if not BETTER than any of the overkill amps I have used in the past.For a long time I to thought BIGGER was BETTER,the 112 changed my mind.
User avatar
Mike Archer
Posts: 6390
Joined: 2 Apr 2004 1:01 am
Location: church hill tn
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Mike Archer »


i agree charles
the 112 is great!!