EQ in effects chain
Moderator: Dave Mudgett
-
Larry Robbins
- Posts: 3522
- Joined: 18 Feb 2003 1:01 am
- Location: Fort Edward, New York
- State/Province: New York
- Country: United States
EQ in effects chain
Currently in my effects chain for my TELE
I run: Tele> TU-2> Blues Driver> DS-1> PH-3>
Dan Echo> GE-7 EQ > to Fender Twin. For you guys who know a whole lot more about electronics ands effects in general, is there a better place in this chain for the EQ ? is there a better order of these effects in this chain?
sounds good to me but, always looking for a better way and to learn something new! Thanks
------------------
72 Professional 8&5,73 PRO II 8&4, 79/80 PRO III 8&4,Fender Steelking, Hilton pedal, USA Tele, Fender Twin,Peterson tuner,Tut Taylor Reso's and Twang to the Bone!!
I run: Tele> TU-2> Blues Driver> DS-1> PH-3>
Dan Echo> GE-7 EQ > to Fender Twin. For you guys who know a whole lot more about electronics ands effects in general, is there a better place in this chain for the EQ ? is there a better order of these effects in this chain?
sounds good to me but, always looking for a better way and to learn something new! Thanks
------------------
72 Professional 8&5,73 PRO II 8&4, 79/80 PRO III 8&4,Fender Steelking, Hilton pedal, USA Tele, Fender Twin,Peterson tuner,Tut Taylor Reso's and Twang to the Bone!!
-
Bob Martin
- Posts: 1871
- Joined: 27 Feb 1999 1:01 am
- Location: Madison Tn
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
Hi Larry, if it were me I'd put the tuner then eq 1st in line then Blues Driver then DS-1. Dan Echo then PH-3. Actually I would take the tuner clear out of the mix some tuners have very cheap inputs and really mess the signal up.
My reasoning for this is I like the eq as close to the guitar that way you are sending the eq'ed signal to all the other effects and then the the with the dist's before the delay and phaser they won't be trying to delay and phase a distorted signal but some folks like it that way so it's mainly just taste.
Bob
<font size="1" color="#8e236b"><p align="center">[This message was edited by Bob Martin on 17 June 2006 at 03:23 PM.]</p></FONT>
My reasoning for this is I like the eq as close to the guitar that way you are sending the eq'ed signal to all the other effects and then the the with the dist's before the delay and phaser they won't be trying to delay and phase a distorted signal but some folks like it that way so it's mainly just taste.
Bob
<font size="1" color="#8e236b"><p align="center">[This message was edited by Bob Martin on 17 June 2006 at 03:23 PM.]</p></FONT>
-
mtulbert
- Posts: 1593
- Joined: 14 Apr 2000 12:01 am
- Location: Plano, Texas 75023
- State/Province: Texas
- Country: United States
-
Larry Robbins
- Posts: 3522
- Joined: 18 Feb 2003 1:01 am
- Location: Fort Edward, New York
- State/Province: New York
- Country: United States
-
Bob Martin
- Posts: 1871
- Joined: 27 Feb 1999 1:01 am
- Location: Madison Tn
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
Hi Larry, the tuner suggestion may or may not be valid in your case anyway. I use to have a cheap korg tuner that sucked every bit of tone out of the signal as well as add noise but then later I got a little nicer korg tuner and tried it and it hardly changed it at all so it's a tuner by tuner deal anyway.
Bob
Bob