Microphone under $100?

Amplifiers, effects, pickups, electronic components, wiring, etc.

Moderator: Dave Mudgett

Chris Brooks
Posts: 1470
Joined: 28 Feb 2000 1:01 am
Location: Providence, Rhode Island
State/Province: Rhode Island
Country: United States

Microphone under $100?

Post by Chris Brooks »

Any recommendations for a decent cheap mike?

Thanks in advance.

Chris

------------------
Carter SD-12 Extended E-9 with 5 & 6; Peavey N 112; Small Stone, Hughes & Kettner Rotosphere.
User avatar
Brad Sarno
Posts: 4958
Joined: 18 Dec 2000 1:01 am
Location: St. Louis, MO USA
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Brad Sarno »

What is your main use for this mic?

Brad

User avatar
Jim Sliff
Posts: 7060
Joined: 22 Jun 2005 12:01 am
Location: Lawndale California, USA
State/Province: California
Country: United States

Post by Jim Sliff »

Guessing it's either for vocals or miking a guitar amp, th4e best cheap mic I've found is the MXL Fox - it's a budget SM58-style and great bang-for-the-buck (as are a lot of the MXL studio mics - $99 can get you a Neumann or AKG-type knockoff that is tremendous).
User avatar
Martin Abend
Posts: 1037
Joined: 1 Mar 1999 1:01 am
Location: Berlin, Germany
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Martin Abend »

I have the MXL 900 condenser mike and for the 60 EUR I payed on ebay for it it sounds just awesome. But don't A/B it with a Neuman...

Also check a russian make called Oktava. I have a buddy that swears by them.

Edit: It's a MXL 990.

------------------
martin abend Pedal-Steel in Germany
s-10 sierra crown gearless 3 x4 | GiMa squareneck

<font size="1" color="#8e236b"><p align="center">[This message was edited by Martin Abend on 30 November 2005 at 02:29 PM.]</p></FONT>
John Macy
Posts: 4335
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Rockport TX/Denver CO
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by John Macy »

The new AudioTechnia 2020 is pretty nice, extremely well built, and seems pretty consistent and streets for $99... My rep dropped a couple off for us to try, and would be a good investment for that price. The build quality is great.
User avatar
Mark van Allen
Posts: 6426
Joined: 26 Sep 1999 12:01 am
Location: Watkinsville, Ga. USA
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Mark van Allen »

Ditto on the AT 2020. If you can spare another $100 try out an Audio Technica 3035- fantastic mic on most vocals, acoustic guitar, dobro, toms...
I have several JoeMeek mics I got direct for $75. I believe they are the pre-cursors to the Studio projects line, but whatever they morphed into they are some of my favorite go-to mics, even sound good on scratchy fiddlers. If I ever see any more of 'em on ebay... oops...

------------------
Stop by the Steel Store at: www.markvanallen.com
User avatar
Erv Niehaus
Posts: 27210
Joined: 10 Aug 2001 12:01 am
Location: Litchfield, MN, USA
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Erv Niehaus »

The old standard, Shure SM58, is still going for $99.99 @ Musicians Friend. And the Shure SM57 is priced at $89.99. Image
User avatar
Marlin Smoot
Posts: 824
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 12:01 am
Location: Kansas
State/Province: Kansas
Country: United States

Post by Marlin Smoot »

I agree, the 58 is a great mic in your price range. Sometimes you can find them used for $50 or less. Some mics look cool but sound kinda muddy. The 58 is excellent for vocals and guitar amps. The 57 is a great mic too, if I couldn't find a 58 I'd take a 57.
Chris Brooks
Posts: 1470
Joined: 28 Feb 2000 1:01 am
Location: Providence, Rhode Island
State/Province: Rhode Island
Country: United States

Post by Chris Brooks »

Thanks, guys. I should have mentioned it's for vocals.

Chris
User avatar
Will Holtz
Posts: 335
Joined: 5 Mar 2004 1:01 am
Location: San Francisco, California, USA
State/Province: California
Country: United States

Post by Will Holtz »

Is the application for live reinforcement or recording?
User avatar
Jim Peters
Posts: 1481
Joined: 29 Dec 2003 1:01 am
Location: St. Louis, Missouri, USA, R.I.P.
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Jim Peters »

For live music, get a 58. For recording vocals, try one of the Marshall condensor mikes.
To hear this mike (Marshal), click here Imagethrill is gone)
http://www.swirlband.com/songs.html <font size="1" color="#8e236b"><p align="center">[This message was edited by Jim Peters on 29 November 2005 at 02:42 PM.]</p></FONT>
User avatar
Mike Winter
Posts: 871
Joined: 17 Jul 2003 12:01 am
Location: Portland, OR
State/Province: Oregon
Country: United States

Post by Mike Winter »

What Erv, Marlin and Jim said. Image

------------------
Mike
------------------
Blue Moon Highway
(Country Music...and then some.)
www.bluemoonhighway.com

User avatar
Jack Stoner
Posts: 22147
Joined: 3 Dec 1999 1:01 am
Location: Kansas City, MO
State/Province: Kansas
Country: United States

Post by Jack Stoner »

We just bought a Samson Q7, supercardiod mic, under $100 at Sam Ash.

We were looking at the Beta58 and tried it and a Beta 87A, to replace an SM58 when the salesman asked us to try the Samson Q7. The Q7 seems to have more gain than the Beta58 and much more than the SM58.

We needed a "hotter" mic for my wife, who has a weak voice. We used it on the stage today, at our weekly job and a major improvement over the SM58. I used to have to run the input gain, on a Peavey XR600g, at 6 and that was almost on feedback and it still wasn't really loud enough for my wife. With the Samson, I set the input gain on 3 and she was "loud".
D Schubert
Posts: 1235
Joined: 27 Jul 2000 12:01 am
Location: Columbia, MO, USA
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by D Schubert »

The SM-57 and SM-58 are "standards" for live performance. You can expect good results with lo- and medium-priced PA equipment, as well as higher-end stuff. You can drop 'em many times before they break. I have several that have been used weekly since the 70's. No complaints.
Chris Brooks
Posts: 1470
Joined: 28 Feb 2000 1:01 am
Location: Providence, Rhode Island
State/Province: Rhode Island
Country: United States

Post by Chris Brooks »

Thanks for your inputs. Yes, this is for live vocals . . . or as live as I can be while singing and picking.

I'll probably go with what I suspected was a Best Buy, an SM-58 or SM 57.

Cheers,

C
User avatar
Jim Sliff
Posts: 7060
Joined: 22 Jun 2005 12:01 am
Location: Lawndale California, USA
State/Province: California
Country: United States

Post by Jim Sliff »

For recording the Marshall (MXL) 990 is unbeatable for the price - around $70 at GC and Muscian's Friend. A nice condenser with great sound, a shock mount and hard case. I don't know howw they do it at that price, but many major studios use them now when they don't want to break out the $5,000 mics...
User avatar
Jim Peters
Posts: 1481
Joined: 29 Dec 2003 1:01 am
Location: St. Louis, Missouri, USA, R.I.P.
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Jim Peters »

Chris, our band uses Senheiser mikes now, but you just can't lose with 58's. My wife uses a Shure condensor mike(I don't remeber the #) that is a lot hotter and cleaner than a 58. The 57 has a lot more proximity effect, it can be too much if you're not careful. JimP
User avatar
Jim Sliff
Posts: 7060
Joined: 22 Jun 2005 12:01 am
Location: Lawndale California, USA
State/Province: California
Country: United States

Post by Jim Sliff »

He was asking about *cheap* mics.

BTW, MF has the MXL 990 on sale for $49!
User avatar
Marlin Smoot
Posts: 824
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 12:01 am
Location: Kansas
State/Province: Kansas
Country: United States

Post by Marlin Smoot »

*Decent* was also mentioned. It's all subjective anyway.
User avatar
Dave Grafe
Posts: 5372
Joined: 29 Oct 2004 12:01 am
Location: Hudson River Valley NY
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Dave Grafe »

There are mics that are a little bit cheaper and there are mics that are a lot better than the Shure SM58, but it's still the best deal on the planet by far - it's the one mic that you'll never ever need to replace.<font size="1" color="#8e236b"><p align="center">[This message was edited by Dave Grafe on 01 December 2005 at 11:58 AM.]</p></FONT>
User avatar
Jim Sliff
Posts: 7060
Joined: 22 Jun 2005 12:01 am
Location: Lawndale California, USA
State/Province: California
Country: United States

Post by Jim Sliff »

Nothing indecent about the MXL's. Just a lot of mic for the money.
User avatar
Brad Sarno
Posts: 4958
Joined: 18 Dec 2000 1:01 am
Location: St. Louis, MO USA
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Brad Sarno »

Ya just gotsta have an SM58 in your collection. That's one of those desert island mic's.

Brad
User avatar
Bill Myers
Posts: 489
Joined: 2 Mar 2005 1:01 am
Location: Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, USA
State/Province: Pennsylvania
Country: United States

Post by Bill Myers »

Do yourself a favor....forget an SM58....this is technology that is 30 years old! Take a look at an Audix OM-2. They are made in the US...And they will flat blow the doors off of a 58 for punch and clarity. We bought some of these mics and the lead singer wouldn't give up his 58...until after he hear the other singers on the om-2....then he said..give me one of those mics...just my 2 cents

------------------
2003 Carter D10, 9x5 Black and 1998 Carter D10 9x5, Evans Amp


User avatar
Craig A Davidson
Posts: 3932
Joined: 16 Feb 2001 1:01 am
Location: Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin USA
State/Province: Wisconsin
Country: United States

Post by Craig A Davidson »

The nice thing about an SM-58 or SM-57 is that you can get use them either live or in the studio with good success. Yers there are better but like the old Fender ad, I won't part with mine either.
Wayne Franco
Posts: 1306
Joined: 24 Sep 1998 12:01 am
Location: silverdale, WA. USA
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Wayne Franco »

I sure like my Sennheiser 609 Silverface for my Steel. sounds just like it.