5751 Twin preamp tube
Moderator: Dave Mudgett
-
Brad Sarno
- Posts: 4958
- Joined: 18 Dec 2000 1:01 am
- Location: St. Louis, MO USA
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
5751 Twin preamp tube
Has anyone tried a 5751 tube instead of a 12AX7 in their preamp tube position in a Twin (V2 usually)? I've read that this was a SRV choice. Here are some quotes:
#####################################
Tech info: Unlike a 12AX7, the 5751 has a lower gain of 70 (100 for a 12AX7) just like the originals. The tube is lower impedance, and has predominent 2nd harmonics for a sweet, smooth tone. The 5751 is famous for its linear response and good transconductance and this tube holds true to that specification.
The 5751 has a bit less gain than a 12AX7, (30% less) and a more linear tone, Smoother, with outstanding clarity and "chime." Overdrives in a different manner when compared to other tubes (not as harsh) Very cool.
Stevie Ray Vaughan preferred them in his Super Reverb and Vibroverb in tube #2 (reverb preamp) for a clean tone with far more headroom than a 12AX7. It is one of the Characteristics of the "chime" tone.
The 5751 is not a 12AX7, it is a different tube with different character.
#######################################
So far I like it in my Twin. Anyone tried it?
Brad Sarno
#####################################
Tech info: Unlike a 12AX7, the 5751 has a lower gain of 70 (100 for a 12AX7) just like the originals. The tube is lower impedance, and has predominent 2nd harmonics for a sweet, smooth tone. The 5751 is famous for its linear response and good transconductance and this tube holds true to that specification.
The 5751 has a bit less gain than a 12AX7, (30% less) and a more linear tone, Smoother, with outstanding clarity and "chime." Overdrives in a different manner when compared to other tubes (not as harsh) Very cool.
Stevie Ray Vaughan preferred them in his Super Reverb and Vibroverb in tube #2 (reverb preamp) for a clean tone with far more headroom than a 12AX7. It is one of the Characteristics of the "chime" tone.
The 5751 is not a 12AX7, it is a different tube with different character.
#######################################
So far I like it in my Twin. Anyone tried it?
Brad Sarno
-
Mark Herrick
- Posts: 1154
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Bakersfield, CA
- State/Province: California
- Country: United States
I think some of the difference is going to depend on which 12AX7 you compare to. I'm using a JAN Phillips 12AX7WA in my Custom Vibrasonic and it sounds very nice. I swapped it today for a GE 5751 and it was similar but not quite as sweet/warm. I tried the new Groove Tube 12AX7M (the Mullard copy) and it has significantly higher gain, but not as sweet.
So now I have a Phillips 12AX7WA in V1 and the GE 5751 in V3. It sounds pretty nice. Tomorrow I will go back to a 12AT7 in V3 and see what difference that makes.
BTW, several years ago I had an amp tech service a Mesa Boogie Mark IIB. When I told him I was using it for steel guitar and wanted clean headroom, he replaced ALL the preamp tubes with GE 5751's. Whereas previously you could get nice distortion at low volume on that amp, afterwards it was difficult to get distortion at all.
------------------
So now I have a Phillips 12AX7WA in V1 and the GE 5751 in V3. It sounds pretty nice. Tomorrow I will go back to a 12AT7 in V3 and see what difference that makes.
BTW, several years ago I had an amp tech service a Mesa Boogie Mark IIB. When I told him I was using it for steel guitar and wanted clean headroom, he replaced ALL the preamp tubes with GE 5751's. Whereas previously you could get nice distortion at low volume on that amp, afterwards it was difficult to get distortion at all.
------------------
-
jim milewski
- Posts: 951
- Joined: 18 Nov 1998 1:01 am
- Location: stowe, vermont
- State/Province: Vermont
- Country: United States
-
Donny Hinson
- Posts: 21830
- Joined: 16 Feb 1999 1:01 am
- Location: Glen Burnie, Md. U.S.A.
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
Dan Tyack
- Posts: 5090
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Olympia, WA USA
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
Brad Sarno
- Posts: 4958
- Joined: 18 Dec 2000 1:01 am
- Location: St. Louis, MO USA
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
Jerry Van Hoose
- Posts: 1755
- Joined: 8 Aug 2003 12:01 am
- Location: Wears Valley, Tennessee
- State/Province: Tennessee
- Country: United States
-
Erv Niehaus
- Posts: 27205
- Joined: 10 Aug 2001 12:01 am
- Location: Litchfield, MN, USA
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
Brad Sarno
- Posts: 4958
- Joined: 18 Dec 2000 1:01 am
- Location: St. Louis, MO USA
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
Jerry, what happens with a lower gain preamp tube is that the preamp will remain clean and the power tubes will start to max out and overdrive before the preamp ever gets into clipping. It basically cleans up the preamp. I was just told by someone that the 5751 will sound great on guitar, but on steel it kind of gets funny as you work your way up the neck. I haven't messed with it enough to concur. He wasn't a fan of it on steel.
My understanding is that this tube is a military grade 12AT7 and works better in the V3 (reverb driver) circuit or as the final phase splitter tube. Since these are positions for a 12AT7 anyway, it's a natural choice.
Playing strat into my Deluxe Reverb with the 5751 in the preamp tube position sounded amazing. Made me want to play SRV's Lenny all day.
Brad Sarno
My understanding is that this tube is a military grade 12AT7 and works better in the V3 (reverb driver) circuit or as the final phase splitter tube. Since these are positions for a 12AT7 anyway, it's a natural choice.
Playing strat into my Deluxe Reverb with the 5751 in the preamp tube position sounded amazing. Made me want to play SRV's Lenny all day.
Brad Sarno
-
Jerry Van Hoose
- Posts: 1755
- Joined: 8 Aug 2003 12:01 am
- Location: Wears Valley, Tennessee
- State/Province: Tennessee
- Country: United States
Low gain, but an oh-so-smooth sound!