Delay "Fattens" Sound
Moderator: Dave Mudgett
-
Lee Baucum
- Posts: 10843
- Joined: 11 Apr 1999 12:01 am
- Location: McAllen, Texas (Extreme South) The Final Frontier
- State/Province: Texas
- Country: United States
Delay "Fattens" Sound
I've read where some folks use a little delay to "fatten" their sound. How do you achieve this? Can you tell me, in milliseconds, what your settings are? Do you "regen", or just use one repeat? What's a good all-round setting to use, without having to worry about tapping in different times to fit the song? I tend to use something in the 200 to 300 ms range, one repeat. Very subtle in the mix. I also use some plate reverb.
------------------
Lee, from South Texas
Down On The Rio Grande
------------------
Lee, from South Texas
Down On The Rio Grande
-
Alan Kirk
- Posts: 849
- Joined: 15 Mar 2002 1:01 am
- Location: Scotia, CA, USA
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
Lee,
"Fattening" with delay usually means adding a bit, to taste, to make the sound a little bigger. The human ear starts hearing the delay at about 30 miliseconds (the lowest setting on an old Eventide Harmonizer). For basic fattening, without actually hearing a doubling, you'd want to stick to between 30-60 miliseconds, I would think. As you add more delay, you risk ending up in muddy waters, especially as the tempo gets quicker.
It sounds like you're approaching it from a musical point of view: "subtle in the mix." Add regen to taste.
I really don't think there is "one setting fits all" when it comes to delay. It depends on the tune, on the band, on the acoustic environment, etc. Just keep experimenting.
------------------
"Fattening" with delay usually means adding a bit, to taste, to make the sound a little bigger. The human ear starts hearing the delay at about 30 miliseconds (the lowest setting on an old Eventide Harmonizer). For basic fattening, without actually hearing a doubling, you'd want to stick to between 30-60 miliseconds, I would think. As you add more delay, you risk ending up in muddy waters, especially as the tempo gets quicker.
It sounds like you're approaching it from a musical point of view: "subtle in the mix." Add regen to taste.
I really don't think there is "one setting fits all" when it comes to delay. It depends on the tune, on the band, on the acoustic environment, etc. Just keep experimenting.
------------------
-
Bob Knight
- Posts: 5095
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Bowling Green KY
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
Brad Sarno
- Posts: 4958
- Joined: 18 Dec 2000 1:01 am
- Location: St. Louis, MO USA
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
One important factor on delay is to have the ability to darken the tone of the echo. If you can shave off the treble of the repeats, then you can get away with more and louder repeats creating a thicker stronger effect without it being obvious. The old tape echos did this by themselves. Many of the newer digital delays will offer this feature too.
I read somewhere that 133ms is the delay that many of us associate with the classic rockabilly delays. It was based on tape speed and the gap between the heads. Or was it 113ms? When you get much longer than that, tempo becomes an issue. Proper delay timing on the longer echoes can make the difference between an obvious effect and a natural almost invisible bigness to the sound. I often like to time my delays to 1/8th note triplets in a given song.
Brad Sarno
I read somewhere that 133ms is the delay that many of us associate with the classic rockabilly delays. It was based on tape speed and the gap between the heads. Or was it 113ms? When you get much longer than that, tempo becomes an issue. Proper delay timing on the longer echoes can make the difference between an obvious effect and a natural almost invisible bigness to the sound. I often like to time my delays to 1/8th note triplets in a given song.
Brad Sarno
-
Larry Behm
- Posts: 4536
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Mt Angel, Or 97362
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
C Dixon
- Posts: 7339
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Duluth, GA USA
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
Bill Carpenter
- Posts: 306
- Joined: 7 Feb 2003 1:01 am
- Location: Liberty Hill, Texas, USA
- State/Province: Texas
- Country: United States
-
Tony Palmer
- Posts: 1702
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: St Augustine,FL
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
Len Amaral
- Posts: 4894
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Rehoboth,MA 02769
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
Brad Sarno
- Posts: 4958
- Joined: 18 Dec 2000 1:01 am
- Location: St. Louis, MO USA
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
Tony Prior
- Posts: 14716
- Joined: 17 Oct 2001 12:01 am
- Location: Charlotte NC
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
Jeff Hogsten
- Posts: 688
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Flatwoods Ky USA
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
it can be good but it can muddy it up if your not in a good room, someplaces you have getting out in a room with out any, you can sit your sound the same for every place you play and it just depends on how much time you have for a sound check, just as you have to adjust your tone you have to asjust the delay for different rooms Jeff
<FONT SIZE=1 COLOR="#8e236b"><p align=CENTER>[This message was edited by Bob Knight on 27 April 2004 at 04:52 PM.]</p></FONT>
