New Model Fender Twin (80 watt) with 1-15

Amplifiers, effects, pickups, electronic components, wiring, etc.

Moderator: Dave Mudgett

User avatar
Lefty
Posts: 1651
Joined: 6 Jun 2000 12:01 am
Location: Grayson, Ga.
State/Province: -
Country: United States

New Model Fender Twin (80 watt) with 1-15

Post by Lefty »

I saw in Musician's friend that Fender has a new twin out. It is based on the 80 watt model, with 1-15 that is "Based on the D-130 JBL speaker" complete with aluminum dust cover.
I am curious if anyone has tried on of these with pedal steel.
Lefty
Dekley D-10
Sho-Bud LDG
Gibson Lap
User avatar
CrowBear Schmitt
Posts: 11624
Joined: 8 Apr 2000 12:01 am
Location: Ariege, - PairO'knees, - France
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by CrowBear Schmitt »

User avatar
Lefty
Posts: 1651
Joined: 6 Jun 2000 12:01 am
Location: Grayson, Ga.
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Lefty »

Thank you CrowBear.
Lefty
User avatar
Tim Whitlock
Posts: 2044
Joined: 3 Jan 2001 1:01 am
Location: Colorado, USA
State/Province: Colorado
Country: United States

Post by Tim Whitlock »

I replaced the stock speakers in my 65 Twin Reverb Re-issue with a JBL D130-F, so mine should be close to the new amp soundwise. The stock Jensen speakers were very muddy. After installing the JBL, I've got a pretty good steel amp. I'd be curious to hear an answer to Lefty's question, if anyone has demoed this new amp with a PSG.
User avatar
John Bechtel
Posts: 5103
Joined: 1 Jul 2002 12:01 am
Location: Nashville, Tennessee, R.I.P.
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by John Bechtel »

I guess it could be considered a whole new topic, however; one thing I can't understand is: If an Amp. doesn't sound satisfactory to begin with, why do you buy it? Why is everyone into rebuilding and modifying? Just curious! It seems like such a waste of time that could be spent actually playing! Opinions welcomed. “Big John”

------------------
“Big John” Bechtel
http://community.webtv.net/KeoniNui/BigJohnBechtels

User avatar
Jerry Van Hoose
Posts: 1755
Joined: 8 Aug 2003 12:01 am
Location: Wears Valley, Tennessee
State/Province: Tennessee
Country: United States

Post by Jerry Van Hoose »

Hi Big John, I'm taking cover from that one, ha ha. Thanks for the AD 9 idea.
User avatar
David Doggett
Posts: 8088
Joined: 20 Aug 2002 12:01 am
Location: Bawl'mer, MD (formerly of MS, Nawluns, Gnashville, Knocksville, Lost Angeles, Bahsten. and Philly)
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by David Doggett »

Okay, John, I'll take a stab at this. Sometimes you buy an amp because at the moment it seems to be the best available at your price. Later you become aware of better sounding amps, and you get some more money, and you wonder if you can make yours better. Even regardless of cost, some amps sound satisfactory stock, but can be made even better with some fairly inexpensive and simple mods. Some pros obsess over these things because they are perfectionists, and because they feel their career depends on it. Others are hobbyists who find the technology interesting. Some people pay techs to make these changes, other people have or gain the skills to do it themselves. For some of us this is a necessary evil, but some people enjoy tinkering with electronics as much as playing music.

People just like to tinker. It is often said that the necessity of war has created a lot of inventions and technological progress. But it is equally true that playing with our toys for the fun of it has also created a lot of inventions and technological progress. The Chinese developed gun powder and rockets just to have fun with fireworks before anyone thought to make weapons with them. The tinkerers have given the rest of us a lot of good stuff to use. I say let tinkerers tinker, and let players play, and some people can do some of both. Image
User avatar
Dave Zirbel
Posts: 4273
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Sebastopol, CA USA
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Dave Zirbel »