Fender Vibro Channel out of phase?
Moderator: Dave Mudgett
-
Karl Oberlander
- Posts: 154
- Joined: 19 Jun 2003 12:01 am
- Location: Austin, Texas, USA
- State/Province: Texas
- Country: United States
Fender Vibro Channel out of phase?
I was told recently that on all Fender amps with a Vibro channel, the Vibro channel is out of phase. Meaning that if you put a signal through the Normal channel it will push the speaker cones out and if you do the same thing on the Vibro channel it will pull the speaker cones inward. i. e. the opposite of the Normal channel. Is this truw and what does that do to the tone of the Vibro channel? Also, can it be reversed?
I'm using a SF Super Reverb and I want to use the Reverb on the Vibro channel.
Thanks in advance for any info.
Kobe
------------------
Gibson D-8 Console Grande - Stringmaster T-8 - Alkire EHarp D-10
Fender Super Reverb
kobe@austin.rr.com
http://home.austin.rr.com/kobeco
I'm using a SF Super Reverb and I want to use the Reverb on the Vibro channel.
Thanks in advance for any info.
Kobe
------------------
Gibson D-8 Console Grande - Stringmaster T-8 - Alkire EHarp D-10
Fender Super Reverb
kobe@austin.rr.com
http://home.austin.rr.com/kobeco
-
Jon Light (deceased)
- Posts: 14336
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Saugerties, NY
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
Yes. If you run the same signal into both channels of a trem. or reverb Fender simultaneously they will be out of phase. This manisfests as a thinner, weaker signal as you turn them up. No harm done except to the tone. Yes, it can be reversed. Not by a layman but it's not a major job for a technician.
Note that the issue is feeding the same signal to both sides. Two different instruments on either side presents no such problem.
Note that the issue is feeding the same signal to both sides. Two different instruments on either side presents no such problem.
-
Ken Fox
- Posts: 9749
- Joined: 20 Apr 2001 12:01 am
- Location: Nashville GA USA
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
It requires de-soldering one wire and moving it to a new location. You will then have reverb/tremolo on both amd the added gain stage for channel one will now have them in phase.
Just remove the wire that goes from the .047 cap off of tube #1 (gain stage #2) to the 200K summing resistor. Place that wire at the output side of the .02 cap, that is on the output of tube #2, gain stage #2. This can be done at the juction of the 3.3M and the 10 pf cap, along the top side of the board, closer to the volume control panel.
I have done three of these mods in the last two weeks. Sounds and works great. The amps were a 1969 Super Reverb, 1969 Deluxe Reverb and a 1970 Dual Showman Reverb.
If you use the amp for steel, mod channel #2 slope resistor to 56K. You now have a guitar and steel channel, both with reverb!
If the steel is really hot and overdriving the input, use input jack #2 on channel #2 (padded down) or you can mod it like the 90's Vibrasonic by removing the cathode bypass cap on channel #2 preamp tube #2, stage 1. I do not prefer that mod, tried it on the bench and preferred just using the #2, padded input.
Just remove the wire that goes from the .047 cap off of tube #1 (gain stage #2) to the 200K summing resistor. Place that wire at the output side of the .02 cap, that is on the output of tube #2, gain stage #2. This can be done at the juction of the 3.3M and the 10 pf cap, along the top side of the board, closer to the volume control panel.
I have done three of these mods in the last two weeks. Sounds and works great. The amps were a 1969 Super Reverb, 1969 Deluxe Reverb and a 1970 Dual Showman Reverb.
If you use the amp for steel, mod channel #2 slope resistor to 56K. You now have a guitar and steel channel, both with reverb!
If the steel is really hot and overdriving the input, use input jack #2 on channel #2 (padded down) or you can mod it like the 90's Vibrasonic by removing the cathode bypass cap on channel #2 preamp tube #2, stage 1. I do not prefer that mod, tried it on the bench and preferred just using the #2, padded input.
-
Karl Oberlander
- Posts: 154
- Joined: 19 Jun 2003 12:01 am
- Location: Austin, Texas, USA
- State/Province: Texas
- Country: United States
Thanks guys,
I do not "ever" plug anything into the Normal channel since I have two of these '67 AB763 Super Reverbs.
One I have moded to the steel spec on the Vibro channel already with the 56k slope resistor and the silver mica 250pF cap replacing the old ceramic treble cap. I switched out the bass amd mid EQ pots for a 1M and a 25k as well. Also, on this one I moded it to take a pair of 6550's and it really sounds great.
I did the same mods on the other one except I switched the bypass cap on the Vibro channel to 250Mf x 6v. This one I left with the standard 6L^'s and it realy sounds good with a Tele or Strat.
I also seperated the cathodes so both channels are independent. Both amps are incredibly clearer and way louder than they used to be.
I was just wondering how that out of phase thing worked but it looks like I'm OK as is now.
Thanks again for the info.
Kobe
------------------
Gibson D-8 Console Grande - Stringmaster T-8 - Alkire EHarp D-10
Fender Super Reverb
kobe@austin.rr.com
http://home.austin.rr.com/kobeco
I do not "ever" plug anything into the Normal channel since I have two of these '67 AB763 Super Reverbs.
One I have moded to the steel spec on the Vibro channel already with the 56k slope resistor and the silver mica 250pF cap replacing the old ceramic treble cap. I switched out the bass amd mid EQ pots for a 1M and a 25k as well. Also, on this one I moded it to take a pair of 6550's and it really sounds great.
I did the same mods on the other one except I switched the bypass cap on the Vibro channel to 250Mf x 6v. This one I left with the standard 6L^'s and it realy sounds good with a Tele or Strat.
I also seperated the cathodes so both channels are independent. Both amps are incredibly clearer and way louder than they used to be.
I was just wondering how that out of phase thing worked but it looks like I'm OK as is now.
Thanks again for the info.
Kobe
------------------
Gibson D-8 Console Grande - Stringmaster T-8 - Alkire EHarp D-10
Fender Super Reverb
kobe@austin.rr.com
http://home.austin.rr.com/kobeco
-
Earnest Bovine
- Posts: 8372
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Los Angeles CA USA
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
Karl Oberlander
- Posts: 154
- Joined: 19 Jun 2003 12:01 am
- Location: Austin, Texas, USA
- State/Province: Texas
- Country: United States
Curiosity is all. I hadn't heard of the out of phase thing and wondered how it worked.
Kobe
------------------
Gibson D-8 Console Grande - Stringmaster T-8 - Alkire EHarp D-10
Fender Super Reverb
kobe@austin.rr.com
http://home.austin.rr.com/kobeco
Kobe
------------------
Gibson D-8 Console Grande - Stringmaster T-8 - Alkire EHarp D-10
Fender Super Reverb
kobe@austin.rr.com
http://home.austin.rr.com/kobeco
-
C Dixon
- Posts: 7340
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Duluth, GA USA
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
The above is true.
However inovative persons which I believe most musicians are, have found ways to turn "out of phase" problems actually into some desired results.
By playing around with the volume and tone controls and listening carefully a "spacial" effect can be achieved. If one plays Rock with a distortion box on, this is particularly true.
"What hath man wrought"?
carl
However inovative persons which I believe most musicians are, have found ways to turn "out of phase" problems actually into some desired results.
By playing around with the volume and tone controls and listening carefully a "spacial" effect can be achieved. If one plays Rock with a distortion box on, this is particularly true.
"What hath man wrought"?
carl
-
Hiro Keitora
- Posts: 816
- Joined: 29 Dec 1998 1:01 am
- Location: New York, New York
- State/Province: New York
- Country: United States
-
Gino Iorfida
- Posts: 568
- Joined: 27 Sep 2002 12:01 am
- Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- State/Province: Pennsylvania
- Country: United States
-
Ken Fox
- Posts: 9749
- Joined: 20 Apr 2001 12:01 am
- Location: Nashville GA USA
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
Gino, it was a pressure, I mean pleasure! Always glad to jump in and confuse the issue where I can!!!
The 56K would replace a 100K in the tone stack of channel 2. It is at the junction of the 100K plate load resistor on the 2nd half of tube #2. You can download a schematic and a board layout for the amp from the Fender Amp Field Guide:
http://www.ampwares.com/ffg/index.html
If you can not find it there, then try http://www.schematicheaven.com
The 56K would replace a 100K in the tone stack of channel 2. It is at the junction of the 100K plate load resistor on the 2nd half of tube #2. You can download a schematic and a board layout for the amp from the Fender Amp Field Guide:
http://www.ampwares.com/ffg/index.html
If you can not find it there, then try http://www.schematicheaven.com
-
Hiro Keitora
- Posts: 816
- Joined: 29 Dec 1998 1:01 am
- Location: New York, New York
- State/Province: New York
- Country: United States
-
Jay Ganz
- Posts: 2566
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Out Behind The Barn
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
