nanoverb vs lexicon mpx 100

Amplifiers, effects, pickups, electronic components, wiring, etc.

Moderator: Dave Mudgett

User avatar
Andy Schick
Posts: 462
Joined: 2 Dec 1998 1:01 am
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada
State/Province: -
Country: United States

nanoverb vs lexicon mpx 100

Post by Andy Schick »

Which one of these units would be quieter. Line noise, hiss etc.
Thanks
Andy
User avatar
Jay Ganz
Posts: 2566
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Out Behind The Barn
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Jay Ganz »

I had a Nanoverb for a couple years. The one
I had was fairly quiet on the reverb settings.
The other effects made a bit more noise.
I used to plug it into the amp input but if
you used it in an FX loop instead, I'm sure
it would be OK. The only Lexicon I've got
is an old LXP-1. That almost has to be used
in an FX loop, but MAN that thing sounds
nice!

------------------
<b>
<a href=http://artists.mp3s.com/artists/568/jay_ganz.html>
My MP3.com page</a>


Michael Brebes
Posts: 1281
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Northridge CA
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Michael Brebes »

The Lexicon should be quieter and have a better sound.
User avatar
Brad Sarno
Posts: 4958
Joined: 18 Dec 2000 1:01 am
Location: St. Louis, MO USA
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Brad Sarno »

I just opened up my nanoverb and man is that a piece of crap in there. The very cheapest components money can buy. It's an 18bit unit and sounds sort of ok but nothing special. It's really hard to beat the Lexicon reverb sound.



------------------
Brad Sarno
Blue Jade Audio Mastering
St. Louis

Gary Walker
Posts: 1937
Joined: 20 Jul 2000 12:01 am
Location: Morro Bay, CA
State/Province: California
Country: United States

Post by Gary Walker »

My Nanoverb is small, has a better sound than the spring units and have been using it for 2 years with a Session 500 and now with my new Webb 614E. I have other digital reverbs but this is compact and works fine.
Pat Burns
Posts: 2933
Joined: 10 Jan 1999 1:01 am
Location: Branchville, N.J. USA
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Pat Burns »

...I'm not familiar with the Nanoverb...I have 2 MPX 100's, both silent in relation to noise or hiss...
User avatar
Bobby Lee
Site Admin
Posts: 14863
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Cloverdale, California, USA
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Bobby Lee »

I quit using the Nanoverb because it was so noisy. The MPX 100 has it beat hands down, both in features and sound quality.

------------------
<font size="1"><img align=right src="http://b0b.com/Hotb0b.gif" width="96 height="96">Bobby Lee - email: quasar@b0b.com - gigs - CDs, Open Hearts
Sierra Session 12 (E9), Williams 400X (Emaj9, D6), Sierra Olympic 12 (C6add9),
Sierra Laptop 8 (D13), Fender Stringmaster (E13, A6),
Roland Handsonic, Line 6 Variax</font>
User avatar
Michael Johnstone
Posts: 3863
Joined: 29 Oct 1998 1:01 am
Location: Sylmar,Ca. USA
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Michael Johnstone »

I use Nanoverbs and would gladly trade a little noise for the ability to stash it in my pac-a-seat and not have to carry a rack.
I did find that when I tried to put the Nano in the FX loop of my Nash 400,and turned up the front end of the amp where I normally set it(around 7),it would overdrive the Nano into distortion.When I backed off on the amp gain to the Nano or the input control on the Nano itself,I couldn't get the rig as loud as I normally could even if I turned the second amp gain knob all the way up.Therefore,it works best to go from the volume pedal to the Nano and out of the Nano into the amp. I've got several high end Lexicons in my studio as well as software reverb plug-ins etc that are quieter than a Nano but for live gigs like clubs and concerts it's just fine. I'm always much more concerned that I'm gonna get hum from my single coil pickup than from my Nanoverb. -MJ-
Gary Walker
Posts: 1937
Joined: 20 Jul 2000 12:01 am
Location: Morro Bay, CA
State/Province: California
Country: United States

Post by Gary Walker »

Michael, I couldn't have said it better.