<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica">quote:</font><HR><SMALL>Dave, You said: "Poco was like the Eagles farm team". At the risk of gettin' flamed, I say this: Although the
Eagles were a hugely popular band, I like to think that Meissner and Schmidt left to join Poco's farm team. Poco had "mined" a sound that was largely duplicated several years later by the Eagles. Especially the latin influences.
Poco's problem with popularity was that their sound was too traditionally country for pop and too rock-sounding for country. And I think that translating their sound into hard financial return proved to be too difficult of a problem for Epic's marketing people to solve. Clearly, the talent and inovation was there for Poco to be as fabulously successful a band as the Eagles were (are?). </SMALL><HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I am not sure what you mean by " I like to think that Meissner and Schmidt left to join Poco's farm team." the chronology of participation in both bands was such that each player was in Poco first then moved into the Eagles...that's the basis for my "farm team" remark
I have no issue with the evaluation of Poco's commerciality issues... they were an immensely talented group- as witnessed by the successes of some members who moved on... Messina with Loggins, the bass crew at different times with the Eagles, the short lived Souther Hillman Furay band...
perhaps you fear someone might come to the defense of the Eagles as country rock innovators?
I think not... they assimilated and popularized , but did not particularly innovate until "Hotel California" IMO.
just my 2 cents, and I think we are in agreement on the subject for the most part
------------------
"I AM ZUMBODY!"
<small>Zumsteel U12 "Loafer" 8&6 :: Fender T-8 Stringmaster :: Fender Tube Amplification
www.voicenet.com/~vanallen/ :: vanallen@voicenet.com
