Thank goodness for SpySweeper
Moderator: Wiz Feinberg
-
Ray Minich
- Posts: 6431
- Joined: 22 Jul 2003 12:01 am
- Location: Bradford, Pa. Frozen Tundra
Thank goodness for SpySweeper
My corporate network connected PC was just hijacked by my stupid mistake of hitting the wrong X in the nested windows that pop-ups use to accomplish this very feat.
The result was to load & infect my PC with about a half dozen icons for running processes before I pulled the network connection. Fortunately was able to go to my Win98 PC & download SpySweeper.
So far Spy Sweeper has found about 6 running spyware programs, two trojan horses and a system monitor. This would be ultimately miserable to fix with just one PC at home on a dial up. Now's the one time I regret a 120 GB "C" drive.
Watch out for those nested windows, they'll get ya if you're not diligent.
What was really strange was that Spy
Sweeper stated that Internet Explorer was running in memory when there was no listing in the process list for IE.<FONT SIZE=1 COLOR="#8e236b"><p align=CENTER>[This message was edited by Ray Minich on 15 September 2004 at 05:24 PM.]</p></FONT>
The result was to load & infect my PC with about a half dozen icons for running processes before I pulled the network connection. Fortunately was able to go to my Win98 PC & download SpySweeper.
So far Spy Sweeper has found about 6 running spyware programs, two trojan horses and a system monitor. This would be ultimately miserable to fix with just one PC at home on a dial up. Now's the one time I regret a 120 GB "C" drive.
Watch out for those nested windows, they'll get ya if you're not diligent.
What was really strange was that Spy
Sweeper stated that Internet Explorer was running in memory when there was no listing in the process list for IE.<FONT SIZE=1 COLOR="#8e236b"><p align=CENTER>[This message was edited by Ray Minich on 15 September 2004 at 05:24 PM.]</p></FONT>
-
Jeff Agnew
- Posts: 741
- Joined: 18 Sep 1998 12:01 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
-
Joey Ace
- Posts: 9791
- Joined: 11 Feb 2001 1:01 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
-
Ray Minich
- Posts: 6431
- Joined: 22 Jul 2003 12:01 am
- Location: Bradford, Pa. Frozen Tundra
Thanks Joey, I'm gonna do that from now on. Regards.
I wonder if there is any coincidence between my hijack experience and another thread posted here about "the other forum". I went to it for the first time ever yesterday and it was only afterwards that all he!! broke loose with my browser. I ghosted my 120 GB to another 120 GB about a month ago. Current drive not yet cleaned. Maybe gotta swap in the ghosted drive.<FONT SIZE=1 COLOR="#8e236b"><p align=CENTER>[This message was edited by Ray Minich on 16 September 2004 at 08:35 AM.]</p></FONT>
I wonder if there is any coincidence between my hijack experience and another thread posted here about "the other forum". I went to it for the first time ever yesterday and it was only afterwards that all he!! broke loose with my browser. I ghosted my 120 GB to another 120 GB about a month ago. Current drive not yet cleaned. Maybe gotta swap in the ghosted drive.<FONT SIZE=1 COLOR="#8e236b"><p align=CENTER>[This message was edited by Ray Minich on 16 September 2004 at 08:35 AM.]</p></FONT>
-
Ray Minich
- Posts: 6431
- Joined: 22 Jul 2003 12:01 am
- Location: Bradford, Pa. Frozen Tundra
After 8 hours I've given up and gone back to my ghosted disk. I'll clean this one up this winter when we're snowed in. Boy does it look wet in Tennessee. Lots of red & yellow on the precip map.<FONT SIZE=1 COLOR="#8e236b"><p align=CENTER>[This message was edited by Ray Minich on 16 September 2004 at 12:01 PM.]</p></FONT>
-
Larry Robbins
- Posts: 3522
- Joined: 18 Feb 2003 1:01 am
- Location: Fort Edward, New York
-
Wiz Feinberg
- Posts: 6113
- Joined: 8 Jan 1999 1:01 am
- Location: Mid-Michigan, USA
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica">quote:</font><HR><SMALL>I have Adaware and Spybot S&D But I guess you cant have too much protection.
</SMALL><HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I'll second that statement!
Add SpywareBlaster to that group.
I also run both NAV 2004 and AVG Free Beta Edition, plus a hardware and a software firewall.
Wiz
</SMALL><HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I'll second that statement!
Add SpywareBlaster to that group.
I also run both NAV 2004 and AVG Free Beta Edition, plus a hardware and a software firewall.
Wiz
-
Jeff Agnew
- Posts: 741
- Joined: 18 Sep 1998 12:01 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
Running two A/V packages concurrently is generally not a good idea. If you must, be sure they aren't both configured as resident processes. Instead, leave one running in the background and use the other for on-demand scans only.
Running them concurrently leaves you open for conflicts and will drag down system resources. NAV is a known resource hog so I'd be reluctant to add to the burden.
Running them concurrently leaves you open for conflicts and will drag down system resources. NAV is a known resource hog so I'd be reluctant to add to the burden.