Film Scanners: pixels, dpi's...

The machines we love to hate

Moderator: Wiz Feinberg

User avatar
J D Sauser
Moderator
Posts: 3317
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Wellington, Florida

Film Scanners: pixels, dpi's...

Post by J D Sauser »

I am contemplating buying a film scanner to scan the banaboxes full of negatives. Since I went digital, I don't really want to mess much with paper again.

So, when comparing these scanners I am a bit unsure about resolution:
Some will feature, let's say 2,570 X 3,855 pixels.
Others will just state like 2720 dpi.

I would like to learn how I can compare those two ways of describing a machine's resolution and how I can translate it all into MegaPixels (like the ones of a digital camera).

Thanks! ... J-D.

<FONT SIZE=1 COLOR="#8e236b"><p align=CENTER>[This message was edited by J D Sauser on 09 April 2004 at 03:41 PM.]</p></FONT>
User avatar
Cal Sharp
Posts: 2874
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: the farm in Kornfield Kounty, TN

Post by Cal Sharp »

I've never used a film scanner, but I do a lot of flatbed scanning. When I scan film or slides I scan at at least 300%, and at 300 dpi. Save as a .tiff if you think you might print it someday, (print out a couple and see how they look before you scan a whole lot of them) or as a .jpg if it's for the web or computer viewing.

Cal
User avatar
Karlis Abolins
Posts: 739
Joined: 30 Mar 2002 1:01 am
Location: (near) Seattle, WA, USA

Post by Karlis Abolins »

2400 x 3000 would give you the ability to print a 8 x 10 print at 200 dpi resolution. That is 3.2 megapixels, about what you would get with a 3.5 megapixel camera.


The math is easy. Multiply the horizonal resolution by the vertical resolution to get the megapixels (million pixels) which can then be compared to a digital camera. You can divide the resolution by your printers dpi to determine how large a print you can make that will look photgraphic. If you intend to print 8 x 10 prints, you will have to settle for less resolution than if you print a 4 x 6.

Karlis<FONT SIZE=1 COLOR="#8e236b"><p align=CENTER>[This message was edited by Karlis Abolins on 09 April 2004 at 06:21 PM.]</p></FONT>
User avatar
b0b
Posts: 29079
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Cloverdale, CA, USA

Post by b0b »

Think of dpi as "pixels per inch" instead of dots. If your scan area is 1" x 1", the 2720 dpi scannner will give you an image that's 2720x2720 pixels.

Megapixels is a marketing term used to sell cameras. Multiple width x height and divide by 1 million.

------------------
<img align=left src="http://picturehost.net/b0b/ManzBob2.jpg" border="0"><small>               Bobby Lee</small>
-b0b-   <small> quasar@b0b.com </small>
 System Administrator
User avatar
J D Sauser
Moderator
Posts: 3317
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Wellington, Florida

Post by J D Sauser »

Thanks to all Image!
... J-D.
C Dixon
Posts: 7330
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Duluth, GA USA

Post by C Dixon »

b0b is correct.

carl