Lawrence 910s
Moderator: Dave Mudgett
-
Mark Kelchen
- Posts: 306
- Joined: 2 Dec 2000 1:01 am
- Location: Cedar Rapids, Iowa USA
- State/Province: Iowa
- Country: United States
Lawrence 910s
Looking for some opinions on the Bill Lawrence 910 pickups. How do they compare to the E-66 or the GeoL T.W.s?
-
David Doggett
- Posts: 8088
- Joined: 20 Aug 2002 12:01 am
- Location: Bawl'mer, MD (formerly of MS, Nawluns, Gnashville, Knocksville, Lost Angeles, Bahsten. and Philly)
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
Donny Hinson
- Posts: 21818
- Joined: 16 Feb 1999 1:01 am
- Location: Glen Burnie, Md. U.S.A.
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
The 910 has a little more gain in the mid-range than the E-66, and a little more bottom as well. Highs are reduced a bit. Overall, rather "flat" sounding.
The 710 is very close to the E-66, but just a little fuller, but not as flat as the 910. (They still have a little "dip" in the mids.)
The TW's sound like a 710 to me, except with a slight "hump" in the mids instead of a "dip". Overall the TW is very round and full, with none of the "metallic" sound of the E-66 or 710 (which I believe comes from that "dip" in the mid-range). <FONT SIZE=1 COLOR="#8e236b"><p align=CENTER>[This message was edited by Donny Hinson on 06 May 2003 at 08:42 AM.]</p></FONT>
The 710 is very close to the E-66, but just a little fuller, but not as flat as the 910. (They still have a little "dip" in the mids.)
The TW's sound like a 710 to me, except with a slight "hump" in the mids instead of a "dip". Overall the TW is very round and full, with none of the "metallic" sound of the E-66 or 710 (which I believe comes from that "dip" in the mid-range). <FONT SIZE=1 COLOR="#8e236b"><p align=CENTER>[This message was edited by Donny Hinson on 06 May 2003 at 08:42 AM.]</p></FONT>