are more road players using racks or amps
Moderator: Dave Mudgett
-
Jeff Hogsten
- Posts: 688
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Flatwoods Ky USA
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
are more road players using racks or amps
are more road players still using amps or are most switching to rack units.What are some of the more popular rack units.Seems that the tube works or stewert along with the peaveys have a lock on the power amps. I see a lot of evans and stereo steel pre amps and a lot of lexicon effects. What are some of you r observations Jeff
------------------
-
Tony Palmer
- Posts: 1701
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: St Augustine,FL
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
John Paul Jones
- Posts: 305
- Joined: 29 Apr 2000 12:01 am
- Location: San Diego
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
Harry Hess
- Posts: 1131
- Joined: 29 Mar 2000 1:01 am
- Location: Blue Bell, PA., USA * R.I.P.
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
Jeff Peterson
- Posts: 912
- Joined: 22 Jan 1999 1:01 am
- Location: Nashville, TN USA
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
I have several different rigs...but all are based on a rack set up. Studio, tour, and club. Studio contains everything with the kitchen sink included, tour has a Peavey VMP-2 tube stereo pre-amp, Peavey TubeFex, Line 6 Pod Pro, Yamaha SPX-1000, Peavey DPC-1400, Korg DTR-1 tuner, going into 2 Peavey 1-12 cabs or 2 Peavey 1-15 cabs. The club rig is abbreviated to the VMP, TubeFex, and tuner into the very excellent Nashville 1000. I rarely need more than one, (Nashville 1000), to get my point across in a club situation.
The rack configuration will give more flexibility and definitely more approaches sound-wise. That and the fact that I have never been wild about combo-units self-contained reverb units.
If the wiring on your rack is well thought out, you save an enormous time in set up time, as well as weight considerations.
My vote.....rack 'em up!
The rack configuration will give more flexibility and definitely more approaches sound-wise. That and the fact that I have never been wild about combo-units self-contained reverb units.
If the wiring on your rack is well thought out, you save an enormous time in set up time, as well as weight considerations.
My vote.....rack 'em up!
-
Jody Sanders
- Posts: 7055
- Joined: 12 Apr 2000 12:01 am
- Location: Magnolia,Texas, R.I.P.
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
Bob Hempker
- Posts: 1071
- Joined: 26 Jul 2000 12:01 am
- Location: Goodlettsville, TN.
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
I use a rack rig.: 2 BW spkrs., An Evans preamp, a Peavey Profex II, a Stewart PA 1000 Pwr. amp. It works well for me. I think it's all a matter of how big the group is, and how loud they play. One thing nice about conventional amps is, that if you play through two, if one of them goes out, you still have something to fall back on. My power amp went out on me a while back, and I was SOL. I ended up using an old amp we carry on the bus as a spare, and it was horrible. Also, consider the way you personally play, yourself. If most of your playing is simple E9 single note stuff, you can probably get by with a conventional amp. If you play loud C6 chordal stuff and pop your vol. pedal frequently, you may need a little more "soup." Also, do you carry your own stuff or does someone else carry it for you. That is another consideration.
------------------
------------------
-
Derrell Stephens
- Posts: 215
- Joined: 9 Sep 2000 12:01 am
- Location: Shreveport, La. USA
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
Mike Brown
- Posts: 5027
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Meridian, Mississippi USA
- State/Province: Mississippi
- Country: United States
-
Gene Jones
- Posts: 6870
- Joined: 27 Nov 2000 1:01 am
- Location: Oklahoma City, OK USA, (deceased)
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
Mike....wasn't the Session 500 developed from the same concept? (i.e., in response to steelers input as to what they would like to have in an amp)? It was a great amp (I still have one)....but my point is, that after R&D identified what players said they wanted, and then Peavy built it, many players criticised it for being too heavy and didn't support the product. That must be discouraging and I hope that doesn't happen
to the 2000 because they don't like the processor or something.<FONT SIZE=1 COLOR="#8e236b"><p align=CENTER>[This message was edited by Gene Jones on 04 December 2000 at 07:12 AM.]</p></FONT>
to the 2000 because they don't like the processor or something.<FONT SIZE=1 COLOR="#8e236b"><p align=CENTER>[This message was edited by Gene Jones on 04 December 2000 at 07:12 AM.]</p></FONT>