Nashville 112, my opinion

Mike Brown · Post by **Mike Brown** » 3 Jan 2006 7:05 am

Ken Byng,
Yes, you do have to remove the amp from the cardboard shipping carton, or it will otherwise sound "boxy". I couldn't resist a good joke.

Thanks for the great input and support. Johnny and Bruce, hope to see you soon.

Mike Brown
Peavey Electronics Corporation

Ernest Cawby · Post by **Ernest Cawby** » 7 Jan 2006 7:44 pm

I did a dance in Quitman last night and had mine turned to 2 on volume and had plenty to fill the building. Only using a DD3 at 11 11 11 and 800, reverb on 3, works for me, altho I like the Vegas much better, Nan likes the weight of the NV 112 the best. A great little amp with plenty of punch with clear sound. I have been told it has the same front end as the 1000.

ernie

Dan Sliter · Post by **Dan Sliter** » 12 Jan 2006 4:21 am

I got my nashville112 about 8 or 9 months ago
I have several diffrent amp.But i have'nt used anything but the nashville 112 sence i recieved it.I am going to get another one very soon for a back up. It comes right out of the box sounding good.I think there is a break in on the spearker because the sound just kept getting better for aa while.
I have Nashville 400's, Evans, Mosevalve rack system,and they all have there advanage's but for me the nashville 112 has done the job.

Mike Brown · Post by **Mike Brown** » 12 Jan 2006 6:56 am

Jack, I want to hear all opinions about our products. But, as you know and I know, the trend is for good sounding, lightweight amps and an analog amp will always weigh more.

I believe that with our efforts and your feedback/input, our engineers can use their knowledge and the latest technology to provide the most innovative and "usable" products ever. Thanks for your support.<font size="1" color="#8e236b"><p align="center">[This message was edited by Mike Brown on 12 January 2006 at 07:02 AM.]</p></FONT>